Search for: "US v. Joe Chestnut"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) New draft EPO Guidelines for Examination (IPKat) (Innovationpartners) Now mustard (Moutarde de Bourgogne) and chestnuts (Marroni del Monfenera) secure PGI protection (Class 46) Germany BGH: Misleading use of the symbol ® - the ‘Thermoroll’ case (IPKat) Passing off in Germany: to trade or not to trade? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:59 am
Joe Lieberman called it one of his best days in the Senate. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Chestnut Hill, MA; Faina Teperman, President) Atlantic Auto Rental, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
