Search for: "US v. Kemp" Results 41 - 60 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Kemp is an attorney, writer, and editor at Justia. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As noted by GenomeWeb in December 2018, the plaintiffs in the 2018 case in the Southern District of New York — Monib Zirvi of Weill Cornell Medicine; Matthew Lubin, now an internist but previously director of medical genetics at Strang Cancer Prevention Center; and Maria Kempe of Lund University, amended their complaint to include patent attorney Robin Silva as a defendant. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:08 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Pearse, Jr. of Pearse & Stinson, P.A. in Clearwater, Florida, was on the winning side of Kemp & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am by Gideon
It isn’t enough for us to throw our hands up and shrug. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by Bill Otis
Kemp, why the majority was afraid of "too much justice. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:54 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
25 years ago today, when the United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to fairness in the death penalty with its ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:47 am by Liisa Speaker
On June 15, 2017, the Michigan Supreme Court decided Kemp v Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of Michigan (Docket No. 151719), a case concerning a plaintiff’s claim for personal injury benefits when he was injured while unloading items from his vehicle. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
General damages Whilst no case was identified to assist the Judge directly with the assessment of general damages, the Judge considered a number of authorities including MGN Limited v Representative Claimants [2015] EWCA Civ 1291, Reid v Price [2020] EWHC 594 (QB), Re TP (Kemp & Kemp, Vol 3 C2-002), ABC and WH v Willock [2015] EWHC 2687 (QB) and Bull v Desporte [2019] EWHC 1650 (QB) from which it is possible to draw the following guidance:… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
Analogy with Arrow case unhelpful given factual differences between the caseMichael agreed that there are key differences between the facts of Arrow v Merck and the present case - an observation also made by Carr J in his judgment when he sounded a note of caution on the use of the term "Arrow" declarations. [read post]