Search for: "US v. Mark James"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2006, 10:44 am
by James R. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
The Book of Genesis -- sort of the Marbury v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:29 am
Tovey v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Thus, the James Van Praagh Trademark would constitute a valid mark for purposes of a trademark infringement claim pursuant to the Lanham Act, 15 U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am
”) James v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
MoveOn.org also argued that its use of a modified version of the service mark was strongly protected because it was an expressive use for non-commercial purposes and that the service mark belonged to the State of Louisiana, which was the target of the parodic use. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:39 am
Fort James Operating Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
James looked at trade marks, copyright and trade secrets/confidential information.On trade marks, James focused on recent case law. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:47 pm
Katfriend James Nurton (editor, Managing Intellectual Property) chaired the keenly-awaited session on trade marks and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which was opened by Allan Rosas -- a judge of the CJEU. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Southwick, Judge James E. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Let us hope the court can get back to its real job in capital cases in the coming term. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
MoveOn.org also argued that its use of a modified version of the service mark was strongly protected because it was an expressive use for non-commercial purposes and that the service mark belonged to the State of Louisiana, which was the target of the parodic use. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
MoveOn.org also argued that its use of a modified version of the service mark was strongly protected because it was an expressive use for non-commercial purposes and that the service mark belonged to the State of Louisiana, which was the target of the parodic use. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
State, Judge James M. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:45 am
James Pandol, Cancellation No. 92048691 [Section 2(d) opposition to PANDOL and PANDOL FAMILY FARMS for fresh fruit in view of the allegedly previously-used mark PANDOL for fresh fruit].May 30, 2013 - 2 PM: Great Seats, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:42 pm
The New York Times reported on the filing of House’s lawsuit against Mark Twain on January 27, 1890The “stolen ideas” lawsuit, captioned House v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:41 am
” James v. j2 Cloud Servs. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:20 am
The Board noted that UNIP uses the mark MORE THAN AN ATHLETE, "which is effectively the same use as Ms. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Following Buck v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Following Buck v. [read post]
