Search for: "US v. Mark Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
RED DAWGRED BULLJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Adam Johnson) Monster Energy Company v Red Bull GmbH [2022] EWHC 2155 (Ch) (12 Aug 2022)One of the grounds for opposing a trade mark is that it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark that has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 12:15 am
The American Red Cross (ARC) expressed outrage earlier this week that Johnson & Johnson (J&J) was suing ARC for trademark infringement. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Co. v Johnson’s Publ’g Co., 473 F.2d 901, 902 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP § 1207.01. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
HJI licenses franchisees to use Howard Johnson marks. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
None of the currency found on Johnson was marked buy money. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:59 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark EARNING TRUST WITH EVERY BOTTLE for "facial and skin cleansers; facial and body washes soaps; shampoos; body lotions," deeming Applicant Johnson & Johnson's specimen of use unacceptable. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]