Search for: "US v. Martinez Holmes" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
Flight alone, however, " is insufficient to justify pursuit because an individual has a right "to be let alone" and refuse to respond to police inquiry' " (id., quoting People v Holmes, 81 NY2d 1056, 1058). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Eugene Volokh
The “thought that we hate” phrase, by the way, comes from Justice Holmes’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously suggested in 1919 in Schenck v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am by Anna Christensen
” Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca ponders Justice Oliver Wendell Holmesuse of the term “bad law. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Fields originated at work; and the knife used in the assault was used at work, thus “facilitating the assault. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
"  In case you're wondering, Holmes did not think much of freedom from vaccination either. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 18, 2008 Martinez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
” Fans of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle will recognize that iterative disjunctive syllogism is nothing other than the process of elimination, as explained by Doyle’s fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  The third's a little hard to research, so we'll use a proxy for the allowing of negligence concerns in strict liability, which is whether a plaintiff’s comparative fault/negligence reduces the verdict or at some level becomes a complete defense.Here's what we've found:AlabamaAlabama follows its own peculiar form of strict liability called the “Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ed. 2d 990 (2015) (joined opinion) “district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that prisoners failed to establish substantial likelihood of success on the merits of Eighth Amendment challenge” Martinez v. [read post]