Search for: "US v. Napier" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm by Jon Sands
US v Napier, 463 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir 2006) does not require it. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:25 am by Ben
But a rival company Geostel Vision used Napier to manufacture their own cup assembly that was alleged to be substantially copy of Oraka's design and in 2013 the Court of Appeal found that Geostel and Napier Tool & Die copied part of the machine. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:18 am by Shon Hopwood
” The key disagreement between the parties is whether the Court’s 1926 decision in Napier v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  So is there anything there we can use? [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:27 am by Giles Peaker
(Our thanks to Spencer Turner for this guest post) Brent Council v Shah and Others, unreported 29 January 2018 (Crown Ct (Harrow)) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) has been successfully used by Brent Council against landlords for breach of licencing conditions. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
The Locomotive Inspection Act did not itself contain a preemption clause, but an 85-year-old precedent, Napier v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
Teo Xuan Lang of Drew and Napier discusses a particularly interesting result recently reached in Singapore. [read post]