Search for: "US v. Napier"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2023, 11:43 pm
The court also declined to follow the judgment in Naidoo v Birchwood Hotel http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2018/113.pdf and disagreed with that judge’s view that exemption clauses will not pass constitutional muster, having reference to, for example, Barkhuizen v Napier http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2007/5.pdf. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
US v Napier, 463 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir 2006) does not require it. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:23 am
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:41 am
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
Photographer Andy Aitchison, was arrested at home on suspicion of criminal damage after reporting on a protest outside Napier Barracks. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:43 am
In re Napier, 55 F.3d 610, 613 (Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
Teo Xuan Lang of Drew and Napier discusses a particularly interesting result recently reached in Singapore. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:27 am
(Our thanks to Spencer Turner for this guest post) Brent Council v Shah and Others, unreported 29 January 2018 (Crown Ct (Harrow)) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) has been successfully used by Brent Council against landlords for breach of licencing conditions. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 6:29 am
Napier used precise, non-qualifying language. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Napier, 461 S.W.2d 119, 121 [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:25 am
But a rival company Geostel Vision used Napier to manufacture their own cup assembly that was alleged to be substantially copy of Oraka's design and in 2013 the Court of Appeal found that Geostel and Napier Tool & Die copied part of the machine. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 9:11 am
Napier and Sgt. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 5:10 am
Napier v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:20 pm
NSAEFF v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 8:22 pm
Supreme Court case of Napier v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
See In re Napier, 55 F.3d 610, 613 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
See In re Napier,55 F.3d 610, 613 (Fed. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am
Bock, 549 U.S. 199 (2007) (nonexhaustion is affirmative defense); Napier v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
So is there anything there we can use? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm
Instead, it digs up an an 85-year old precedent, Napier v. [read post]
