Search for: "US v. Santiago, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
., ET AL. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, 6:10cv111 / PACid v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
(See Laurie Gould et al., Reforming the Use of Eyewitness Testimony, 35 Okla. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
(See Laurie Gould et al., Reforming the Use of Eyewitness Testimony, 35 Okla. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:56 pm
"(People v Santiago, 22 NY3d 740, 754 [2014] [Rivera, J., dissenting]). [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:28 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:30 pm
(by EPIC)Laura Pendergest-Holt, et al v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:56 pm
This form of investing by sovereigns has become an important new element in emerging patterns of governance in this century (Clark et al., 2010; Gilson & Milhaupt 2007–8). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
§ 6021 et seq. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
It has also become a focus of shareholder actions within enterprises, and regulatory programs in the US federal government. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 11:15 pm
Connecticut Department of Transportation, et al. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am
En cuanto al tribunal de instancia se ventiló el caso Colegio Bautista de Levittown v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am
§ 95.11 et seq.). [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am
Quick links Anna Bond, Lexology: Professor’s ‘anti-Zionist’ beliefs were protected: on Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022: we noted the case here. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
AAR MANUFACTURING, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
Caulkins et al., “Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentencee: Throwing Away the Key or the Taxpayers’ Money? [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:23 am
Caulkins et al., “Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentencee: Throwing Away the Key or the Taxpayers’ Money? [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness:… [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:10 pm
” Similarly, in the case Escher et al v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:43 am
Two years later, he received the title of Count of Superunda (Superunda means “over the waves”) for his efforts in rebuilding the city of Lima and its port, which had been destroyed by an earthquake and a tsunami in 1746 (Mas et al., 10). [read post]
