Search for: "US v. Snipe" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
Some recent related posts: Federal prosecutors want Wesley Snipes imprisoned for three years Split verdict in Wesley Snipes trial ... and another potential high-profile acquitted conduct case Wesley Snipes to be sentenced two weeks too late A taxing analysis of celebrity sentencing issue in US v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:45 pm
Some recent related posts: A taxing analysis of celebrity sentencing issue in US v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:42 pm
Some recent related posts: Federal prosecutors want Wesley Snipes imprisoned for three years Split verdict in Wesley Snipes trial ... and another potential high-profile acquitted conduct case Wesley Snipes to be sentenced two weeks too late [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:26 pm
Some related Wesley Snipes posts: Federal prosecutors want Wesley Snipes imprisoned for three years Split verdict in Wesley Snipes trial ... and another potential high-profile acquitted conduct case Wesley Snipes to be sentenced two weeks too late A taxing analysis of celebrity sentencing issue in US v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:49 pm
Some related posts: Split verdict in Wesley Snipes trial ... and another potential high-profile acquitted conduct case Wesley Snipes to be sentenced two weeks too late UPDATE:  Thanks to White Collar Crime Prof Blog's post here, the government sentencing brief in US v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Jon Hyman
And, when we prove that we are right, we think the plaintiff should pay us for our grief and aggravation. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm by Ken
It’s uncommon for two of us to blog about the exact same thing here at Popehat; usually one of us strikes first and the other snipes from the comments. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Although the patent specification may not be used to rewrite the claim language, SuperGuide Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
Her lawyers told the High Court in London the fashion chain duped fans and may have damaged her reputation [as if such a thing were possible, snipes Merpel]. [read post]