Search for: "US v. Thomas Norman" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
Officer Starks printed a copy of Clay's comments, which were later introduced into evidence at trial.Cedric McCray, who had accompanied Clay to Thomas's apartment and witnessed the fight, testified Clay used the box cutter in self-defense after Thomas hit her with the chair.Clay v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:51 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
   Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, essentially saying “supervisory authority” cannot be used to circumvent or supplement established legal standards for voir dire questioning [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
Waiting in line for that long is never easy, but fortunately Norman Pattis, of the firm with which Karen Torre is Of Counsel, was behind us in line and happened to be a fascinating person. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:21 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: EVELYN DIFELICI, f/k/a EVELYN BARNES v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
In the Wake of the Plague is Norman Cantor's entry in the Be-the-Next-Jared-Diamond! [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm by Michael Stevens
Harold Blankenship     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 09a0026n.06  Norman Choate v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm by Michael Stevens
Harold Blankenship     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 09a0026n.06  Norman Choate v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:34 pm by Jason Shinn
 Bishara, Norman and Martin, Kenneth J. and Thomas, Randall S., When Do CEOs Have Covenants Not to Compete in Their Employment Contracts? [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am by admin
  Says Norman Siegel, who represents the owners: “A private property owner has the right to determine the best productive use of his property. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]