Search for: "US v. Thomas Watson" Results 1 - 20 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 11:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Watson does not argue that the testimony on prior use was in fact corroborated, but rather argues that because Thomas’s testimony was not the sole evidence of obviousness, it should not have been excluded. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:49 pm by Thomas Long
Thomas LongCCHPharmaceuticals company Watson’s proposed generic version of competitor Shire’s brand-name mesalamine LIALDA® did not satisfy the requirements for a Markush group claimed by a Shire patent, the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
Rather, the district court appears to have simply rejected all of Watson's expert's testimony by finding that Thomas was not a person of ordinary skill, but extraordinary skill. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm by P.J. Blount
John Entick sued Nathan Carrington, James Watson, Thomas Ardran and Robert Blackmore (messengers of the King) for trespass. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:15 am
Taylor and Thomas contend that their convictions are tainted by the government's use of peremptory challenges to strike African Americans from the jury pool, in violation of Batson v. [read post]
Thomas Klocke’s father, as administrator of his son’s estate, filed suit against the University for possible Title IX violations and against Watson alleging common law defamation and defamation per se. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
” Judge Watson’s analysis reminds me of a colloquy in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:05 pm by Jon Sands
Watson, No. 09-50666 (2-23-11) (M. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Gregory Forman
However, earlier this week, I was completely schooled by an attorney, Jeffrey Thomas Watson, three years out of law school about the breadth of the res judicata doctrine. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Penningroth’s Everyday Use: A History of Civil Rights in Black Churches in the March 2021 issue of the JAH is available open access.At Harvard Law Today: summer reading for your list from legal historians Elizabeth Papp Kamali and Ken Mack.Over at the Legal History Miscellany: Cassie Watson on the history of acid throwing in Britain.Congratulations to Thomas J. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:00 pm
Today's opinion in No. 06-1284, Watson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
Watson, 31 M.J. 49, 52 (C.M.A. 1990); United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
Four Justices refused to use long introductions at all (Breyer, Scalia, Souter, Thomas) and Justice Alito used them only once (Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]