Search for: "USA, et al v. Land, et al" Results 21 - 40 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Wolfgang Demino
, 644 S.W.2d 705, 706 (Tex. 1982); Houston Omni USA Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:40 pm by Steven Boutwell
Jewell, et al., Civil Action No. 16-145, currently pending in the Lafayette Division of the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
§ 1125(a)) Relief for Unfair Competition Under California Business And Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am by Sean Wajert
SETH BAKER, ET AL., No. 15-457 (U.S., petition granted 1/15/16). [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am by Sean Wajert
SETH BAKER, ET AL., No. 15-457 (U.S., petition granted 1/15/16). [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
Wyndham Worldwide Corporation et al, on the FTC’s ability to regulate private-sector cybersecurity. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]