Search for: "USA V. DAVID MARK"
Results 61 - 80
of 450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, in which the Court will consider whether disparate-impact claims are available under the Fair Housing Act, as do David Savage of the Los Angeles Times and Mark Sherman of the Associated Press. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm
Commentary comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, German Lopez at Vox, and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Wednesday, Dec. 8 Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:36 am
Your Southern District of Florida Blog, David O Markus, Esq., blog proprietor, is breathlessly covering all aspects of USA v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
Among them was a holding that Miller v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
David, Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford, UK, “Familial Imagination in Law and Religion&r [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
Other previews come from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Richard Wolf of USA Today (who has another preview here), Marcia Coyle and Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, and Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:50 am
Pulse Entertainment Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Mark Sherman and Jay Reeves of the Associated Press have coverage. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
Robert Barnes covered the argument for The Washington Post, as did Mark Sherman and Sam Hananel for the Associated Press. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
 David Savage at the L.A. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
” At National Review, David French explains why National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:30 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 11:00 am
An AP article in the USA Today discusses the three criminal cases accepted by the justices yesterday: Bowles v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:41 am
Sometimes patent holders don't want to license, and, under US law, patent holders do not have to license.Sadly, Rizzo really misses the mark in his textAs we noted in our Google-Nest deal analysis, there is certainly the possibility – even given the above patent issues Nest has uncovered – that Honeywell will win the patent lawsuit. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am
Other coverage of the summary reversal in V.L. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
David Kravets at Wired Magazine’s Threat Level blog characterizes the denial of certiorari in Vernor v. [read post]
