Search for: "USA V. TAM DO" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Unsealed qui tam complaint against Pfizer is pressing forward
29 Dec 2007, 8:15 am
The qui tam complaint against Pfizer, USA rel. [read post]
Whistleblower Law Blog - http://whistleblower.labovick.com/
What Was the Relator Thinking? Court Sanctions Relator and Counsel for Frivolous Qui Tam Claim
31 Oct 2012, 7:09 pm by A. Brian Albritton
USA ex rel Watson v. [read post]
False Claims Act & Qui Tam Law - http://falseclaimsactlaw.blogspot.com/
Two Recent Decisions Hold That A Whistleblower Is Not Barred From Bringing A Qui Tam Lawsuit Based Upon Facts Already Known To The Government As A Result Of Audit Or Investigation That Is Not Known To The General Public
4 Mar 2015, 8:10 am by Jonathan Tycko
Philip Morris USA Inc., 763 F.3d 36, 42 (D.C. [read post]
Tycko & Zavareei LLP Blog - http://www.fraudfighters.net/news/
Thursday round-up
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
Tam, a First Amendment challenge to a government refusal to trademark a disparaging name. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Morning Docket: 01.22.18
22 Jan 2018, 5:32 am by Staci Zaretsky
[USA Today Sports] [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/
Scruggs to be arraigned November 20
12 Nov 2007, 12:15 am
One of the latest entries from the PACER docket in USA v. [read post]
Insurance Coverage Law Blog - http://www.insurancecoverageblog.com/
"Patent Marking Police" Out in Full Force
17 Feb 2010, 2:29 pm by Justin E. Gray
Timex Group USA, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00286 (N.D. [read post]
Gray On Claims - http://www.grayonclaims.com/home/
[Eugene Volokh] Some Potentially Racially Offensive Terms Can't Be Trademarked—Because They're Too Common, Not Because They're Racially Offensive
11 Jul 2021, 11:05 am by Eugene Volokh
" … [But] Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
CAFC affirms SD Cal in Pacing Technologies
18 Feb 2015, 9:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sony Computer Entm’tAm. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Federal Circuit Adopts Heightened Pleading Standard in False Marking Cases
16 Mar 2011, 9:24 am by Stefanie Levine
Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
Patent Law Practice Center - http://patentlawcenter.pli.edu
Tuesday round-up
24 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
Tam, which stems from the government’s refusal to trademark a rock band’s disparaging name, and Nelson v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Tuesday round-up
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Tam (formerly called Lee v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Online Global Week in Review 26 February 2010 from IP Think Tank
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
Online Global Week in Review 26 February 2010 from IP Think Tank
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
Pleading Intent to Deceive in False Marking: How much is enough?
21 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Stefanie Levine
BP Lubricants USA, Inc., (N.D. [read post]
Patent Law Practice Center - http://patentlawcenter.pli.edu
Lawsuit Alleges False Marking Based on Orange Book “Advertising”
13 Apr 2011, 5:13 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Although the Gray On Claims Blog recently reported that the number of false marking qui tam lawsuits appears to have slowed since the Federal Circuit’s March 15, 2011 decision in In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., in which the Court held that the particularity requirement of Fed. [read post]
FDA Law Blog - http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/
Recent Developments and Potential Changes in the Litigation of False Marking Claims Under 35 U.S.C. § 292
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Analyzing the qui tam provision according to the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
Patent Law Practice Center - http://patentlawcenter.pli.edu
"Paris" on makeup doesn't itself indicate origin
31 Mar 2023, 1:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Eshelby v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Tuesday round-up
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
In Kentucky v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
The Courts and Congress Take Aim at Patent False Marking Lawsuits
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am by Brian Wm. Higgins
Solutions Ltd. v. [read post]
Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.marylandiplaw.com/