Search for: "USA v. Locke" Results 21 - 40 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 7:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 am by Karen E. Keller
Schlage Lock Company LLC (patent infringement) 1/28: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
” [James Bovard, USA Today; Mark Joseph Stern, Slate; earlier] Don’t undermine structural protection Double Jeopardy Clause provides against prosecutorial overreach [Jay Schweikert on Cato amicus brief in Currier v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:51 am
Florida, Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
John's, change the locks, and oust the dissidents. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
Are intellectual property law and economics locked into an eternal collision course, or are they actually best friends? [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept… [read post]