Search for: "USA v. US Infrastructure, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
According to The Wall Street Journal, “Global cybersecurity spending by critical infrastructure industries was expected to hit $46 billion in 2013, up 10% from a year earlier according to Allied Business Intelligence Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
OmniSource DDS, LLC, Opposition No. 91178539 [Opposition to registration of AQUAJET for "Dental instruments, namely, oral irrigators" on the grounds of lack of bona fide intent and likelihood of confusion with the mark AQUAFRESH and formatives thereof, for toothpaste and toothbrushes].July 20 - 2 PM: Sarnafil, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by Kelly
(IPKat) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB: Chippendales’ ‘Cuffs & Collar’ mark not inherently distinctive: In re Chippendales USA, Inc (TTABlog) (Likelihood of Confusion) (Patently-O) 2nd Circuit: An invalid assignment isn’t incontestable: Federal Treasury Enter. [read post]
The expansion of California’s hydroelectric capacity bolsters new construction of key infrastructure relevant to land use development. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Marie Louise
Apple v Samsung (PatLit) Metall auf Metall II – The curious case of free use and sampling (1709 Copyright Blog) Bundespatentgericht confirms no risk of confusion between iMove and IMOVIE (Class 46)   Netherlands Samsung loses Dutch case against Apple over 3G patents as court gives meaning to FRAND (FOSS Patents) (EPLAW)   Spain File-sharing admins jailed for linking to copyright works (TorrentFreak)   Sweden Stockholm District Court: Jail sentence for Pirate… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Haldex Brake Products Corp (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct pleading must allege how examiner would have used undisclosed information: SynQor, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
” The November 2, 2011, decision in Sprint Nextel Corporation v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Gary Corn
Army banned the use of Chinese drones in 2017, citing security concerns documented in classified reports, and the Department of Defense followed suit the next year. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]