Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. Under Seal 3" Results 81 - 100 of 1,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2018, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
" When filing the Petition, Plaintiff moved to file the Letter under seal pursuant to Oklahoma law governing sealed court records. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:03 pm by Allan Blutstein
USMS (D.D.C.) -- on second renewed summary judgment, ruling that: (1) agency failed to show that another court’s sealing order precluded FOIA disclosure of records pertaining to use of cell phone tracking technology during criminal investigation of plaintiff; and (2) agency waived its right to make new withholding claim under Exemption 3, in conjunction with the Pen Register Act. [read post]
31 Oct 2001, 10:00 pm
The first three cases discuss various employment issues that arise under the National Labor Relations Act: (1) the supervisory status of a nurse; (2) hospital employees’ rights to distribute and solicit union information; and (3) the structuring of employee committees so they do not violate the N.L.R.A. [read post]
31 Oct 2001, 10:00 pm
The first three cases discuss various employment issues that arise under the National Labor Relations Act: (1) the supervisory status of a nurse; (2) hospital employees’ rights to distribute and solicit union information; and (3) the structuring of employee committees so they do not violate the N.L.R.A. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Attempts to unseal can work even years after the sealing, see, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 1:57 pm
Congress has the power under Article IV, § 3, cl. 2 of the Constitution to make "all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory … belonging to the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by Giles Peaker
Damages at 3% of rent for 60 months – £1440 Boiler leak – the expert saw evidence of leaking. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:43 am by Peter L. Altieri
Kutner: (1) termination “without cause” is not a per se prohibition of enforcement of a non-compete unless the language of the contract as in this case so provides; (2) conclusory allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference and unfair competition are inadequate and will be dismissed unless supported by facts on each element of proof; and (3) customer and prospect identity and impressions about them are sufficiently sensitive to warrant cause for… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966)). [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 9:58 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Brief Overview Although this case was decided on June 30, 2010, it was filed under seal and the redacted public version was released on August 3, 2010. [read post]