Search for: "Union v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 15,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 1:38 pm
On March 19, 2012 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Southern Union Company v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
On June 21, 2012 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Southern Union Company v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:27 am
In a case in Washington State with a law similar to the LAD, the case of Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 7:45 am
ShareIn 2018, in Janus v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:19 pm
On November 1, 2021, the Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:38 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and another [2008] EWCA Civ 870; [2008] WLR (D) 273 “Information supplied by applicants for animal experimentation licences was exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 if the official in possession of the information knew or had reasonable grounds for believing that it was given in confidence, which was a subjective test requiring consideration of… [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of Janus v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:47 am
Death not ‘adverse effect' Regina (British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “The death of an animal used in a regulated procedure for scientific experimentation was not an adverse effect which needed to be taken into account when deciding whether to grant a licence for such experiments. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:45 pm
By: Erica Shelley Nelson and Sarah Burke In Cheatham v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 8:33 am
Cal.): 13 Amended Complaint 14-1 Union MTD 15-1 State MTD 20-1 Motion to File Second Amended Complaint 21 Union Opposition to 20 22 State Opposition to 20 23 Reply in Support of 20 25 Response to 14 26 Response to 15 28 Union Reply in Support of 14 29 State Reply in Support of 15 33 Second Amended Complaint 34-1 Union MTD Second Amended Complaint 36-1 State MTD Second Amended Complaint 37 Response to 34 38 Response to 36 39… [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 12:42 pm
I have previously written regarding the problem posed by out-of-state civil unions. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of Janus v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:22 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and Another Court of Appeal “Information supplied by applicants for animal experiment licences was exempt from disclosure under freedom of information provisions if the official in possession of the information knew or had reasonable grounds for believing that it was given in confidence. [read post]
31 May 2013, 2:45 pm
State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:12 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and another; [2008] WLR (D) 129 “Where a public official reasonably believed that information had been given under a statutory procedure in circumstances which gave rise at that time to a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the statute prohibited disclosure for purposes other than those to which the Act related, that information was exempt from disclosure under the… [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:06 pm
In Oluwo v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:15 pm
The post Prepare For The State Of The Union! [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:12 am
Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families v Fletcher; Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No 2); [2011] UKSC 36 [2011] WLR (D) 247 “Teachers who had been employed by the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families and seconded to work at European Schools throughout the European Union were entitled to bring unfair dismissal claims before an employment tribunal… [read post]
