Search for: "United Construction Products, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 1,564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2020, 6:02 am by Charles Sartain
Here are the takeaways from Jones Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
The Baytown olefins plant has also awarded contracts to Linde Engineering North America Inc. and Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals Inc. to build olefin recovery units. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Liqwd”) and Olaplex LLC filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that L’Oréal USA, Inc., L’Oréal USA Products, Inc., L’Oréal USA S/D, Inc., and Redken 5th Avenue NYC, L.L.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 12:07 am
Callais involved an association that refused to produce records based upon a contention that the request was designed to harass; the production was required, and fees were awarded.Ritter & Ritter, Inc. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:02 am
  Their products are primarily for automotive, infrastructure, manufacturing, construction, and electricity-generation and distribution markets. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm by Gene Quinn
On the cross-appeal, Federal Circuit found no reversible error in the contested claim constructions, and therefore affirmed the judgment of direct infringement of the Halo patents with respect to products that Pulse delivered in the United States and the judgment of inducement with respect to products that Pulse delivered outside the United States but were ultimately imported into the United States by others, as well as the judgment of… [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:43 am by John L. Welch
Delaware Quarries opposed PlayCore's application to register the mark ROCKSCAPE for "playground equipment, namely, climbing units," claiming a likelihood of confusion with its identical, registered mark for "stone, gravel or similar products, namely boulders, stone veneer, and crushed stone for use in landscaping, building construction, and paving." [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
If thisleads to the anticipated success, it is likelythe product not of innovation but of ordinaryskill and common sense. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:49 am by Docket Navigator
"In constructing a hypothetical 'but for' market for the purposes of a lost profits analysis, '[a]ll markets must respect the law of demand,' which counsels that 'consumers almost always purchase fewer units of a product at a higher price than at a lower price, possibly substituting other products.' The undisputed record shows that during the relevant period [plaintiff's] product prices were between 194% to 819%… [read post]