Search for: "United Fabrics International, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 12:14 am
The winners are: Technology Development * Electric Power Research Institute Inc. for "Fish-Friendly" Hydropower Turbine Development & Deployment * Verdant Power Inc. for Improved Structure and Fabrication of Large, High-Power KHPS Rotors [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 11, 2017 -11 AM: In re Shabby Chic Brands LLC, Serial No. 85135970 [Section 2(b) refusal of the mark shown below left, for various goods in class 20, 21, and 24, including furniture, dinnerware, and fabrics, on the ground that the mark includes a simulation or design that resembles a governmental insignia of the United Kingdom’s Prince of Wales emblem (shown below right)]. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am by Larry
Continuing my effort to catch up on 2017 customs decision from the Court of International Trade, we come to Kalle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:22 pm by Larry
Sure you do, it's a classic of the customs blog genre.The Court of International Trade has now decided the relevant cases, which are Lerner New York, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
  Beyond the basic protection of a signature or exclusive fabric pattern, there is little a designer can do to protect the form, structure, and tailoring of her work once she sends it down a runway in the United States.Fashion is an international, multi-billion dollar industry. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:16 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In Order No. 48 (dated March 23, 2010), ALJ Bullock granted Spansion’s motion for an order compelling Respondents Samsung Electronics Corporation, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents and other information relating to Samsung’s 27 nm products. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:08 am by Ben Vernia
  The United States still has lawsuits pending against Richard Davis, the former chief executive of Second Chance, and Honeywell International Inc. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 9:52 am by Adams Lee
International Trade Commission (“ITC”) to investigate whether the named subject imports are being sold to the United States at less than fair value (“dumping”) or benefit from unfair government subsidies. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:52 pm by Larry
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal recently got a crack at part of that question in Tara Materials, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm by Larry
This time, the decision is Lockhart Textiles Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:31 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Chicago Sun-Times, Inc., 341 Ill.App.3d 555, 563 (1st Dist. 2003) (reporter defendant’s use of the word “kidnapped” conveyed the gist or sting that would have been conveyed by the correct phrase “wrongful removal under federal and international child abduction law”). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
AmeriKat brings us up to date with last week's hearing to determine how the International Trade Commission is to deal with litigants and patent trolls. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:12 am
Judge Love found the patent to be invalid because it was an obvious combination of teachings from prior patents.IPBiz notes that there are apparently some patents that ED Texas does not like.The winning defendants were Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC; Nordstrom, Inc.; The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.; Gap, Inc.; Federated Department Stores, Inc.; Dillard's, Inc.; Bragel International, Inc.; and Ce Soir Lingerie Co., Inc.,… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:05 am by Larry
United States, is a  rare evidentiary dispute at the Court of International Trade. [read post]