Search for: "United Insurance Co. v. Dixon" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co [1944] A.C. 265, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that “[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
”[12] The majority gave no consideration to the cost of having one’s warnings endlessly second guessed in an unpredictable legal system, the effect of insurability and insurance premiums, and the risk of misjudging where the “knowledge” needle might land decades later, when courts and juries judge adequacy of warnings through the retrospectroscope, with the help of tendentious expert witnessing. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Epic also sued Apple in United Kingdom, the European Union and Australia on competition grounds. [read post]