Search for: "United Penn Bank, Appeal of"
Results 61 - 66
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 1:37 pm
I am happy to announce the publication of "Between the Judge and the Law: Judicial Independence and Authority With Chinese Characteristics," which appears in the latest issue of the Connecticut Journal of International Law 33(1):1-41 (2017). [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Laurel Terry, Professor, Penn State Dickinson School of Law, The EU's Professional Services Competition Initiative: Is the EU Very Far Behind Australia and the UK With Respect to Publicly Traded Law Firms? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Alexander Pearl, Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma College of Law -- Jurisgenerative Actions of Tribal Nations and the “Field of Pain and Death” Brought by the Continued Imposition of Federal Legal Structures Kimberlianne Podlas,Professor & Department Head, Department of Media Studies, UNC Greensboro--Reconsidering the Nomos in Today’s Media Environment 12:40-1:30--Lunch Remarks -- Guido Calabresi, Senior United States Circuit Judge,… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and predicted that the… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
The Supreme Court had already duly warned the bar – repeatedly.And notwithstanding Conley, a bunch of court of appeals decisions likewise sought (to varying extents) to rein in conclusory pleadings. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
