Search for: "United Public Workers v. State "
Results 121 - 140
of 2,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2022, 6:24 pm
In Lindquist v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
In Waithaka v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
When his agency starts handing out legal opinion letters to his former employers in the United States litigation industry, Michaels’ hypocrisy becomes something of a public nuisance and a scandal. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
Implement Workers of Am. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Implement Workers of Am. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Implement Workers of Am. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
Implement Workers of Am. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
Implement Workers of Am. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
Implement Workers of Am. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:53 am
A group of public school teachers sought to overturn a 1977 United States Supreme Court decision in Abood v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:30 am
Workers v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Quinn, ___ U.S. ___ (6/30/2014), the United States Supreme Court considered "whether the First Amendment permits a State to compel personal care providers to subsidize speech on matters of public concern by a union that they do not wish to join or support. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Workers v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 11:00 am
She served as counsel in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
United States Postal Service. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:12 pm
The two-judge appellate tribunal held that the judge of compensation appeared to be “antagonistic” to injured worker’s attorney when the attorney asked the hearing officer for an explanation of the fee reduction.The customary counsel fee award in NJ workers’ compensation matters, is a statutory limit of 20%.When the attorney asked the judge of compensation for an explanation of the fee reduction on the record, the stated, “Appeal me,”… [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:58 am
The United States Supreme Court addressed these questions in its unanimous decision in Shurtleff v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:36 pm
Public employee must serve in a “safety-sensitive” position in order to be subject to random testing for alcohol or unlawful drugsNew York City Department of Transportation v R.B., OATH Index #1215/11 R.B., a maintenance worker employed by the Staten Island Ferry Division of the Department of Transportation was served with disciplinary charges after testing positive for marijuana in a random drug test. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
United States, 435 U. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:07 am
Davidson, et al v. [read post]
