Search for: "United States Credit Bureau v. Manning"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Section 3 of DOMA, codified at 1 U.S.C. sec. 7, provides: "In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse' refers only to… [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:52 am
These cases include United States v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
In addition, each state has a national guard commanded by the state's governor and coordinated by the National Guard Bureau. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Kimberlin’s Rule 35 motions have also been denied, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:05 am
On April 24, the FTC filed a Complaint for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, in FTC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
In Henson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:26 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Unlike Europe’s comprehensive privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the United States only has a conglomeration of laws that target specific types of data. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
United States. 36 Colum. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
” Laurie Kazan-Allen and Barry Castleman, “The Passing of a Great Man” (Sept. 13, 2011). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Unit B Nov. 1981)). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Sabol, No. 06-2692 Grant of petitions for habeas corpus is reversed where the Bureau of Prisons rule denying placement in a community corrections center to all prisoners during the first ninety percent of their sentences was a reasonable exercise of the BOP's discretion in carrying out its duties under 18 U.S.C. section 3621(b). [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 04, 2008 State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
