Search for: "United States Surgical Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of  a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of  a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:24 am by Ben Vernia
ICDs are lifesaving devices used to detect and treat abnormal heart rhythms that can result in sudden cardiac death, one of the leading causes of mortality in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:25 pm
     Procedural HistoryZimmer, Inc., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products (collectively “Zimmer”) appeal from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan that U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the judgment, finding the District Court erred, and holding that plaintiff stated a legally viable claim based on an alleged violation of federal law. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDefendant Refusing to Cooperate With Counsel Competent; 'Precautionary' Exam, Testimony Noted United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:11 am by Sebastian Brady
Iraq’s ambassador to the United Nations claimed recently that bodies in mass graves have been found with surgical incisions and missing body parts. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:24 pm by John C. Manoog III
 According to the United States Food and Drug Administration, these surgical mesh devices are used to provide additional support when a doctor repairs weakened or damaged tissue. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 10:37 am
(b) Any such injunction may be served anywhere in the United States on the person enjoined; it shall be operative throughout the United States and shall be enforceable, by proceedings in contempt or otherwise, by any United States court having jurisdiction of that person. [read post]