Search for: "United States of America v. Anderson et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Those lawyers-Texas solo Dan Perez and Michigan-based Patrick Anderson, both of whom frequently work for Spangenberg and his patent companies-quickly hammered out the $4.2 million settlement. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:10 pm
” Similarly, in the case Escher et al v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
I will argue that such considerations counsel that the Commission exercise extreme caution as it looks to revise regulations that govern America’s media marketplace. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Anderson, William L., ed. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Anderson, William L., ed. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Bartrip, Beyond the Factory Gates: Asbestos and Health in Twentieth Century America 77 & n.4 (2006); Peter W.J. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
DSM N.V., et al: Disability claim dismissed because Plaintiff Was Not "Otherwise Qualified" to Perform the Essential Functions of Her Job* FILED* [1-14] Lockheed Martin sued by women for class-based sex/denial of opportunities for advancement discrim; more here* NEWS* [1-13] Teaneck fires Township Mgr following string of harassment lawsuitsNYDECIDED* [1-13] St Ct App: Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
