Search for: "United States of America v. Clear et al" Results 61 - 80 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), section 5 of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c)(UNPA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code -- and on the President's inherent constitutional powers. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:42 am by Rantanen
Merrill et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century, no. 7, 121 (2004). [2] See id. at 7. [3] U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Merrill et al., Nat’l Research Coun- cil of the Nat’l Academies, A Patent System for the 21st Century 122 (2004). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford
In the first of the three lawsuits filed against Hifter, Elzagally et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: : Chapter 11 : Murray Metallurgical Coal : Case No. 20-10390 Holdings, LLC, et al., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that a habeas petitioner must overcome the presumption of correctness of a state factual determination with clear and convincing evidence fits with 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]