Search for: "United States of America v. Kelly"
Results 81 - 100
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
The best case in support of a due process right for a provider to challenge an assistance order is In re Application of the United States of America, 610 F.2d 1148 (3d Cir. 1979). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
The speakers were Kelly Bennett and Thom Clark from the Legal Department. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. 6 Tex. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(RelatIP) United Kingdom Tweaks to the UK patent system (IPKat) UK IPO announces 100th Patent Office Opinion issued since s74A – or is it 98? [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
Kelly Shackelford, the president and chief counsel of First Liberty Institute, one of the nonprofits that litigated the case, said in a statement that Tuesday was “a great day for religious liberty in America. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
In 2010 in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
But marijuana is now, and will remain for some time to come, illegal throughout the United States of America and there are courts of the United States of America in California. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesDominion v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Keith Sullivan Team Members: Arthur Muller (3L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Kiera Fitzpatrick (3L), Alex Zugaro (3L) The competition involved a criminal case of the United States of America v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Bartrip, Beyond the Factory Gates: Asbestos and Health in Twentieth Century America 77 & n.4 (2006); Peter W.J. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesHiQ Labs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
