Search for: "United States of America v. McDonald" Results 21 - 40 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
This law comes after an exodus of major western companies, including Starbucks and McDonald’s, while increasing the pressure on those companies, such as IKEA, the largest furniture manufacturer in the world, who have remained in Russia thus far. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
But because such states are unlikely to pay, Congress passed the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (the “Act”), which established a fund to compensate terrorism victims. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Surveillance for Acute Viral Hepatitis—- United States, 2007. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Before the Supreme Court's Heller (2008) (D.C. cannot ban handguns) and McDonald v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
He has also recently been called by one liberal commentator the “most important legal thinker in America. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Similar to Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The subcommittee will hear testimony from George Kent, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, and Kara McDonald, deputy assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm by David Kopel
As Barnett explains: Spooner supplemented this interpretive claim about original public meaning with a principle of construction he took from the 1805 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]