Search for: "United States v. 11 CASES, ETC."
Results 21 - 40
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 8:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
United States, a case on the Aggravated Identity Theft Statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 11:31 am
Aguirre, Jr., etc., et al., Unites States Circuit Court of Appeals; 3d Circuit, March 11, 2008 [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:08 am
The United States Trustee sought a Rule 2004 Order in order to determine, through an "informed decision," whether the debtor's case should be "presumed abuse" pursuant to §707(b). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:04 pm
The 2 cases being heard are United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012), the takings case argued earlier this week in the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:02 am
State of Tamil Nadu, [( 1981 ) 3 SCC 11], Jumman Khan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:21 am
This comes on the heels of the case decided by the Court in May of this year: United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 4:22 pm
The case is DiCosolo v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
See the United States brief at 22-25. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
The Ninth Circuit opinion in Salameh v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
United States, 365 U. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:15 pm
Petitioner and the Child came to the United States to visit Respondent in August 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:38 am
The case is White v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:51 am
On January 11, 2011, M.V., accompanied by Ramona Vasquez, traveled from the United States to Linares, Mexico. [read post]
