Search for: "United States v. 23, More or Less, Articles Etc" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
     The Introduction to this article can be found in the July 5, 2014 posting on Rubin On Tax. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am by Florian Mueller
I'm not going to do the usual preview post listing patents, products etc. before the trial in the second Apple v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by Schachtman
White-Hat Bias & Black-Hat Ethics I recently came across a disturbing article in the Environmental Health Perspectives, a peer-reviewed journal, supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:35 am by Howard Wasserman
  It’s like the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
The posts have also been (very) lightly edited for typos, spelling mistakes, etc. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to… [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]