Search for: "United States v. 39 CASES, MORE OR LESS, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
There is so much more damage and destruction. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Business continuity plans in case of a cyber-attack. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
It would frankly be surprising if judicial review will make a big difference in either case. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm
Public Performance of Music 39 This is by far the major sector covered by the Board. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
¶¶ 38-39 (Teva v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
Slip Op. at 38-39. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Petrellais considered in more detail below.III. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
(Pages 29-39). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
However, since the New Streamlined Procedures are now available to U.S. taxpayers residing in the United States, the 2014 OVDP is intended to be used by taxpayers who have serious concerns with criminal violations. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRANCE(Application no. 43835/11)JUDGMENTSTRASBOURG1 July 2014This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of S.A.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
The entire syllabus may be ACCESSED HERE.One of my great frustrations in developing this course has been what I consider to its its lack of apparent coherence with the rest more or less conventional parts of the first year curriculum. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
The posts have also been (very) lightly edited for typos, spelling mistakes, etc. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a… [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am
California, etc.), the United States was far and away the source of the most law enforcement requests to Google for information and, even more interesting, far and away had the smallest proportion of requests denied. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
Section 5 provides for procedure, etc. in relation to juvenile justice board. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:16 am
If that is the case, votes at membership meetings may be less than or greater than one vote per unit. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
(2) Where two or more persons have made a complaint under sub-section (1), the licence shall be granted to the complainant who in the opinion of the Copyright Board would best serve the interests of the general public. [read post]
