Search for: "United States v. AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, ETC."
Results 21 - 40
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2007, 5:59 am
– This Decree prescribes necessary procedures, etc. for filing a report, etc. of land acquisition by foreigners. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
In particular, the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), granting Congress the power: “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:02 am
In Popack v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:29 pm
Immigration Law BasicsWhat NY Businesses Should Learn From the United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm
” Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 11:14 pm
The double curse was at work in Roy Food and Wine LLC v Meregalli, 2019 NY Slip Op 32875(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 25, 2019], decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice O. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
United States, a case I discuss below about a 1998 U.S. missile strike on a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant. [read post]
3 May 2022, 12:06 pm
State law governs the administration of a will. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
However, when the product is made abroad and all components but a single commodity article are supplied from the United States, as was the case here, the activity is beyond the scope of the Patent Act. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
" Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
" Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm
The court rejected Google’s submissions on the information economy, suggesting that it collected and used information for the use of others, [39] PIPEDA is quasi-constitutional legislation because its focus is on ensuring that individuals can control their personal information, which is intimately connected to their individual autonomy, dignity and privacy (Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401, 2013… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm
By “valid mark,” I mean a mark that meets the requirements for one in the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
And, indeed, in this aspect, it is not truth or credibility that is important, it is the acceptability or praiseworthiness of the idea, fact etc. advanced, that tales center stage. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
(Michigan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Slip at 4, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
My first column was on “The State of Digitization of United Nations Documents” (June 29, 2010), wherein I bemoaned the lack of a “central hub” for online UN documents and publications. [read post]