Search for: "United States v. Ackerman"
Results 41 - 60
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:05 pm
Ackerman, 831 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2016); United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Much of Masur’s book focuses on debates over state law and state-level civil rights reform efforts, whereas my collection focuses on federal law and national-level constitutional reform efforts. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Yes, the Article V process leading to those Amendments was in some respects procedurally irregular, as Bruce Ackerman has shown. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm
It is specialists who tend to concentrate instead of his actual decisions as a practicing politician, whether candidate for higher office or as President of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The Constitution specifies that when the President of the United States is tried, “the Chief Justice shall preside. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
There’s truth here, but it’s also worth noting that such arguments can prove too much: why not cities or counties or even smaller units rather than states? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Strauss's main point was to reassure readers that it really didn’t matter all that much that Article V made the United States Constitution so notably difficult to amend. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Albert discusses the failure of the Equal Rights Amendment in the United States – a failure that ERA proponents are now attempting to rectify. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:28 am
The case is Knopf v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
” Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there… The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:28 am
” Wait, sorry, had the wrong document there… The actual text of the operative clause provides in full: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In a bid to strengthen Federalist power, President Adams appointed Secretary of State John Marshall to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
It is worth noting that Bruce Ackerman's important rendering of the the New Deal as a "constitutional moment" amending the Constitution outside Article V in effect requires ignoring, or at least diminishing the relevance, of McCulloch. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
United States Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, accused by Virginia Giuffre of sexually assaulting her when she was a teenager under the control of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, has now countersued her in federal court in New York, claiming that her allegations are “lies, disparagement, defamation, harassment” that are “beyond the bounds of decency and not tolerated in civilized society. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
