Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title and Interest"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 5:37 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324, 340 (1977), but the record here says nothing about the facts and circumstances surrounding the hiring of the three past male Vice Presidents. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
I want to apologize to all for being so busy with work and our Recent Decisions of Interest Newsletters that have tripled over the last 6 months. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
It simply referred to a line of prior cases that had squarely rejected the legal theory and deferred to them (as lower courts are bound to do).On appeal, however, the Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, one of the premier advocacy groups for LGBT rights in the United States took over her case. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
That is, indeed, the law in all states of the United States by virture of a federal law establishing a six-year statute of limitations for suits to recover Nazi-looted art, which begins to run upon discovery. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm
“To create an assignment, a contract must transfer: (1) the entire exclusive patent right, (2) an undivided interest[2] in the patent rights, or (3) the entire exclusive right within any geographical region of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
by Dennis Crouch United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Second, UNC is bound by both the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, whereas Harvard is bound only by Title VI. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:10 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court found in favor of Wal-Mart, ending the eleven year Dukes v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:02 am
In response, the defendants filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment aimed at dismissing all claims premised on alleged violations of the Shipper-Must-Have-Title policy. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:27 am
Though the result was preordained, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in FTC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio recently asked itself the same question (as the title to this article asks) in Wellington Resource Group LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Plaintiffs' argument that their due process rights under the United States and New York State Constitutions as their property interests in promotion were adversely affected as the result of the establishment of the two titles by the Department of Civil Service at DOCCS' request, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320, explained "a person successfully passing a competitive… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Plaintiffs' argument that their due process rights under the United States and New York State Constitutions as their property interests in promotion were adversely affected as the result of the establishment of the two titles by the Department of Civil Service at DOCCS' request, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320, explained "a person successfully passing a competitive… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
Grimm, No. 16-273) dealing with a different civil rights law, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which provides that in a school district receiving federal financial assistance, “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, . . . be subjected to discrimination. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:57 am
Two years later, the United States initiated action to seek judicial declaration of abandonment and an order quieting title to the Government to the abandoned right of way. [read post]
