Search for: "United States v. American Precision Products Corp."
Results 41 - 60
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 2:34 pm
One Weird Trick for Forcing Defendants to Settle This story starts in 2007 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
McKesson Corp., 219 P.3d 749, 770 (Cal. 2009) (wrongful discharge) ($1,900,000); Walker v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Allen v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
Cruz, an American citizen of Filipino descent. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that… [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Comcast Corp., 446 F.3d 25, 47–48 (1st Cir.2006); Hadnot v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Bayer Corp., 398 F.3d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 2005) (applying Illinois law); Thomas v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
See, e.g., Apache Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Reducing Industrial Accidents Industrial accidents have long caused carnage in the United States.[2] Generally employers can enhance their employees’ safety in two distinct non-exclusive ways. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The short answer is, “No,” as the Third Circuit correctly held in Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
” The United States is expected to discuss the question of Iran’s recent testing of a new precision-guided ballistic missile at the U.N. [read post]
