Search for: "United States v. American Precision Products Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kim, 50 F.3d 244, 249-50 (3d Cir.1995); Banco Minero Ross, supra, 172 S.W. at 715; Bridgeway Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
Alliance Gaming Corp., 504 F.3d 1356, 1360 (Fed. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
Slater decided that his future lay in emigrating to the United States, he faced such draconian trade-secrets laws in his native Britain (which tried to enforce them in a failed attempt to prevent new technology from arriving to the United States) that he had to keep his travel plans secret from family and friends, and disguise himself as a farm labourer. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
Phillips, precisely what Colorado law required of him seemed murky.To be sure, Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51, 64 (2002) (quoting English); American Insurance Ass'n v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
There were 21 state cases decided by 47 judges. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
United States, 444 U. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., 37 F.3d 96 (3d Cir. 1994), the court refused to expand New Jersey’s “product line” exception to corporate transactions not involving the specific product line. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am by Robert Percival
Korzen, director of the Appellate Advocacy Clinic at the Wake Forest University School of Law, will make his Supreme Court debut in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am by Bexis
  Here’s why.We recently blogged about new United States Supreme Court certiorari grants of interest. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Hanover, MA; Amanda Pascarella, President) American Dictation Corp. [read post]