Search for: "United States v. Avila" Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a naturalized U.S. citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
PG&E owns and operates the Diablo Canyon plant, a two-unit nuclear power plant on 750-acres of land also owned by PG&E near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Jennifer Brand
The “Leaders in Law” monthly webinar series will feature interviews with notable attorneys who are advancing civil rights in the United States and across the world. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:47 am
Merrill's case has been referred to Washington D.C. for an en banc hearing before all 19 judges on the United States Tax Court. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am by Levin Papantonio
Nearly ten years ago, in 2013, the United Nations adopted a resolution designating July 30 as World Day Against Trafficking in Persons. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
United Airlines (1989) 208 Cal.App.3d 71, 75.This point is particularly important in defamation claims because each new publication begins a new statute of limitations. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Michael Lowe
  Here, the person who has been arrested also faces a federal fight against being deported and removed from the United States. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
State Department, the group will be based largely in Poland and bring together multinational experts, including war crimes prosecutors and forensic specialists. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]