Search for: "United States v. Barnes"
Results 61 - 80
of 860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Neither of her parents attended college: Her father, Nathan, came to the United States from Russia as a teenager and worked as a furrier; her mother, Celia Amster Bader, was born a few months after her parents arrived in the country from Austria and worked in a garment factory to put her brother through college. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
In another essay for the series, Amelia Burnette explores United States Forest Service v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:13 am
United States, which held that the government was obliged to make certain disputed payments to health insurance companies under the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
That’s why, in Utah v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
In an op-ed at The Hill, Elizabeth Slattery and Ethan Blevins observe that “[t]he vast majority of private schools in the United States are religiously affiliated,” and that thanks to the court’s ruling last week in Espinoza v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:13 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
"] From Judge Royce Lamberth's opinion this morning in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
United Parcel Service Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:58 am
” Cites to Barnes v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
Barnes & Noble, 763 F.3d 1171, 1175-76 (9th Cir. 2014)); see also, Van Tassell v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 12:52 pm
WALL: So, yes, we are saying that these subpoenas, and certainly these subpoenas taken in the aggregate, once the House has this weapon, will harm and undermine the presidency of the United States, not just this President, the institution of the presidency going forward. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Baum v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
God save the United States and this honorable court. [read post]
