Search for: "United States v. Barrett" Results 201 - 220 of 1,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
  If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 3:14 pm by Josh Blackman
The Emoluments Clause was the premier anticorruption clause in the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Maryellen Fullerton
§ 1255 – complete the transition to LPR status while remaining in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
“Unlike those cases,” the plaintiffs argue, “this case concerns violations by U.S. citizens from U.S. territory where no foreign state could complain about the United States holding its citizens accountable for such violations. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by Amy Howe
The decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Hearron gave what I thought were suboptimal answers, but the correct answers ought not to have damaged his overall case.The second set of questions arose in the first case but primarily were discussed in the second one, United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This evening, within hours of the Senate's party-line confirmation vote, Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in as the 103rd Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This evening, within hours of the Senate's party-line confirmation vote, Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in as the 103rd Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:04 am by Charles Kotuby
Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, LLP, et al., v. the Fund for Protection of Investor’s Rights in Foreign States. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 4:24 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, which starts this way (per Barrett):The Double Jeopardy Clause protects a person from being prosecuted twice “for the same offence. [read post]