Search for: "United States v. Bayer"
Results 141 - 160
of 294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
by Renée Kolar Since its inception, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has won 58 out of 60 arbitrations against athletes who have contested the agency’s sanctions. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am
by Jeremy Clare The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order compelling arbitration because plaintiffs failed to establish a change in controlling law. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Moreno v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:49 pm
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer's settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
See Pfizer Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 2:04 pm
The Court recalled that for there to be an agreement, it is sufficient that at least two undertakings express their joint intention to conduct themselves on the market in a specific way (see Case T-41/96 Bayer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondents, Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
United States, the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, and same-sex marriage. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
” More about the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:30 am
by Jeremy Clare The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the district court exceeded its authority under 9 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing § 11 (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol]. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
