Search for: "United States v. Bayer"
Results 161 - 180
of 294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 6:34 am
Is there any way that Bayer v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am
The outcome:West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Ltd (“WestWard”)1 appeals the decision of the United States DistrictCourt for the District of Delaware holding that claims 1–3of U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:59 pm
Bayer Corp., 131 S.Ct. 2368 (2011). [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
Three days ago, the United States Supreme Court unanimously upheld the federally-backed regime in Cafastan against the latest insurgent assault in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
Bayer Corp., in the Eastern District of Texas; and United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
The forum was co-sponsored by the NanoBusiness Alliance, American Chemistry Council, United States Council for International Businesses, and the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
See, e.g., Bayer v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm
That case is Ransom v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
At minimum, there’s now a circuit split, which might be a reason for the United States Supreme Court to review the issue.This “common defense exception” to fraudulent joinder can loom large in our drug/device cases. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:21 am
Plaintiffs appealed the trial court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on August 8, 2007.Finally, a few days later, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York excluded the opinion testimony of a plaintiff’s expert regarding the alleged link between the plaintiff’s ephedra use and a subsequent brain hemorrhage. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Verizon removed the cased to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm
Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC No. 15-1335 (4th Cir. 2016), which John summarizes on his own blog here, that its reading of the Lanham Act is the rigorous one, and that it is in fact following the teaching of Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 1:23 pm
United States, 318 F.3d 250, 252 (D.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
See Tang, slip op. at 7-9.Still, some enterprising lawyers tried to make that litigation the latest Chinese export to the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
Bayer Corp. [read post]
