Search for: "United States v. Bland" Results 141 - 160 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2011, 10:34 pm
This was not taken into account by the Division Bench at all; the Court makes a bland reference [“see Adams v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm by Schachtman
It is unprecedented in 49 prior trials and depositions where I have testified, in federal and state courts all over the United States, including many cases in Texas. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bland, No. 06-3223 Conviction for bank robbery is affirmed where: 1) there was no Brady violation since evidence suppressed by the prosecution was not material to an issue at defendant's trial; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to conduct an independent in camera review of the evidence in question. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
The precise nature of a Facebook “Like” was considered in Bland v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am by Rory Little
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
After about nine weeks of opportunity to work out a majority one way or the other to decide the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Pursuant to protocol -- five police units already were on the scene -- she “just stayed off” from the house. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
Constitution—has the bland ring of a human resources circular: “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]