Search for: "United States v. Board of Supervisors"
Results 181 - 200
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:00 am
Board of Supervisors, 18 Cal.2d 193, 196 (1941). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
Code, § 66000 et seq.) and the takings clause of the United States Constitution, namely the special application of the “unconstitutional conditions doctrine” in the context of land use exactions established in Nollan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm
United States 21-171Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Kavanaugh wrote for a unanimous court, vacating board decisions in both Southern New England Telephone Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:35 pm
• United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
**Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:31 pm
United States, Dr. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
The consultant thus concluded CEQA’s recirculation requirement was not triggered, and the Commission recommended approval of the modified plan to County’s Board of Supervisors. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
On December 11, 2012, the Board of Supervisors began its deliberations. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
[Click on citation to access the opinion.]Skilling v United States (Dkt No 08-1394). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Instead, the crew was ordered by the onsite supervisor to straighten the monkey board and pipe manually using ratchets and cables. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:51 am
Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 7:44 am
More than anything, this email highlights why forming a WFOE and why it tends to be so complicated and time consuming, and how different it is from forming a company in the United States. [read post]
