Search for: "United States v. Broderick"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: An assumption that dominates the discourse on race in the United States is that racial subjugation is only harmful to the subjugated. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested… [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
Broderick, J.D., M.B.A. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:59 am
ATBCOIN LLC, March 31, 2019, Broderick, V.). [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:56 am
United States, 195 F.2d 433, 436 (10th Cir.1952); see also, e.g., Ware v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
In advance of the Sporting Chance Forum, part of the United Nations’ yearlongcommemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders call on States, international sports associations, sportspersons, and other stakeholders to protect and respect international human rights law and standards in the field of sports, without discrimination of any kind. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:08 am
" Other cases addressing use immunity include Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:42 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:27 am
” The CFAA is the primary computer crime law in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
" [Motion to appeal denied, 93 N.Y.2d 803.]Howevere, in the event an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent any false answer the individual might give the investigator from being used against the individual if he or she is subsequently charged with perjury [United States v Apfelbaum, 445 US 115].The Ali decision is posted on the Internet at:[archive.citylaw.org] [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:03 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
