Search for: "United States v. Burdick" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:56 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
I want to make one observation about this; a quote from the Supreme Court's 1915 opinion in Burdick v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
A few recent related posts: * No Personal Jurisdiction Over Nasty Facebook Post–Burdick v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
 The United States Supreme Court held that jurisdiction over the reporter and the editor in California was proper “based on the ‘effects’ of their Florida conduct in California. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am by Marie Louise
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm by Richard Hornsby
… This right shall be construed in conformity with the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Click Here Cory King settles with state on feedlot charges. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
The National Law Journal The Supreme Court's unusual order Monday delaying a decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]