Search for: "United States v. Burlington Industries, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by Daniel Hemel
United States — imposes taxes on “compensation” paid by railroads to their workers. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am by Sheppard Mullin
Instead, it was adopted by the Supreme Court as a way to identify those individuals whose actions could give rise to vicarious employer liability in the two earlier decisions of Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:16 am by Brian Peterson
  11-556 (decided June 24, 2013) (PDF), the United States Supreme Court decided a question left open in Burlington Industries, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Marvin Kirsner
Porpoise Evans Currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]