Search for: "United States v. Burnett"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 6:00 pm
United States, Burnett Ranches was a family owned Texas livestock ranch that had been in operation for more than 150 years. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
” (Slip Op. at 18) (citing United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:35 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
United States v.Burnett, 14-1288, 2014 WL 6463173 (3d Cir. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 10:01 pm
Burnett writes: Navassa was declared “appertaining” to the United States by the State Department – over the strenuous objections of Haiti, which considered neighboring Navassa part of Haitian territory – on December 8, 1859. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm
United Agr. [read post]
D.Utah: Protective sweep does not permit looking inside a computer bag, but it does permit moving it
22 May 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
Burnette filed an antitrust class action complaint against numerous real estate brokerages in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am
Recently, a federal jury in the Middle District of Missouri found the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) and two major real estate brokerages—Keller Willams and HomeServices of America—liable under United States antitrust laws for conspiring to fix prices in the class action lawsuit, Burnett v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Burnett in its December 11, 2014 decision in Matter of Noella Lum B. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:43 pm
Facts: This case (Marketquest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:32 pm
Today we will look at United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:14 pm
., standards (see this column’s recent blog on United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:32 pm
In the case Burnett v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:27 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg In drug trial, testimony that hotel clerk saw the defendant drop "a little baggy containing a ‘white substance'" was relevant even without any evidence confirming the nature of the substance, in United States v. [read post]
