Search for: "United States v. Cabbage"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
" The Cabbage Patch Kids dolls were at the heart of a dispute in the case entitled, Original Appalachian Artworks v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
It is reported that several years ago, the mark Pet Rock was registered as a trademark in the United States (unfortunately due to the power outage at the USPTO offices in suburban Washington DC, this Kat was unable to verify this information). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Leslie, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellee. 4th District. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:18 am
The United States, at the time, characterized that seizure as “unlawful. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:07 am
EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01/20092009 FL H.B. 1385 (NS)March 16, 2009 NEW FDA DECREE COVERS ALL CARDINAL 303 INFUSION PUMPS, United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Heddon, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), in which the Supreme Court of the United States had to decide whether at tomato is a fruit or a vegetable for purposes of the Tariff Act of March 3, 1883. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
He claims the phrase is meant to promote local agriculture (kale is a type of cabbage). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
(Jewell's Lessee v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(PatLit) United Kingdom Limitation of damages in the Patents County Court (EPLAW) UKIPO issues TPN (3/2011) – hearings in cases of invalidation on relative grounds (Class 46) United States US General Does 337 apply to foreign trade secret missapropiation? [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 3:57 am
., United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 4:48 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge [i] Lexington began as a frontier trading post in 1860. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:18 am
Bel Canto Design, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
