Search for: "United States v. Cheng"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2017, 5:17 pm
In Mascareignes Sterling Co Ltd v Chang Cheng Esquares Co Ltd (Mauritius), the Privy Council of the United Kingdom recently set out some helpful principles to define the entitlement of a contractor to extra payment under a fixed price contract. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
District Court for the District of Massachusetts 2013) (citing United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am
In other news… United States In a speech at Australian National University, U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States, to name but a few. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:24 am
Young, From World Duty Free to Metal-Tech: A Review of International Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases Involving Allegations of CorruptionBrandt J C Pasco, United States National Security Reviews of Foreign Direct Investment:: From Classified Programmes to Critical Infrastructure, This is What the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States Cares AboutJoost Pauwelyn, At the Edge of Chaos? [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
Cheng v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am
(“Newegg”) in TQP’s suit for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,412,730 (the “’730 Patent”). [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm
Contents: Articles THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN UNITED KINGDOM COURTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by Merris Amos STATE LIABILITY FOR JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN EUROPEAN UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Arwel Davies WHY THE FRENCH DON’T LIKE THE BURQA: LAÏCITÉ, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, by Myriam Hunter-Henin THE DUTY TO GIVE REASONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Jarrod Hepburn THE CONTINUING MYTH OF EURO-SCEPTICISM? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Kaplan (1995) 514 U.S. 938, 944; see also Cheng-Canindin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:14 am
United States, I confess I am rather ambivalent about the award. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
There is much to comment on from the various case studies, and although Professor Cheng claims to take a politically moderate view (p. 16), some will have their eyebrows raised by, or take exception to, his extensive criticism of the ICJ’s judgment in the Nicaragua case (pp. 141-162); the suggestion that the award of the NAFTA tribunal in Loewen v United States is in part defensible as it “reduc[ed] the risk that the United States… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
